<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Blending the mix - Latest Comments in Is Friendfeed bringing us more up to date yet further apart?</title><link>http://blendingthemix.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://blendingthemix.disqus.com/is_friendfeed_bringing_us_more_up_to_date_yet_further_apart/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 05:39:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is Friendfeed bringing us more up to date yet further apart?</title><link>http://blendingthemix.com/2008/03/27/is-friendfeed-bringing-us-more-up-to-date-yet-further-apart/#comment-6090196</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Nils I actually like the way that it summarises activity to a particular individual (say, if one of my friends has posted a lot of tweets in quick succession), but I think that the more services you add to friendfeed, the harder it would be to take it down to the granular level.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That said, if you COULD separate out conversations on the same networks (i.e. all the people who used twitter could converse on a twitter tab for example), then that would add significant value.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulfabretti</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 05:39:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Friendfeed bringing us more up to date yet further apart?</title><link>http://blendingthemix.com/2008/03/27/is-friendfeed-bringing-us-more-up-to-date-yet-further-apart/#comment-6090195</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Corvida - I know exactly what you mean, it is only an option but it is one of those really cool tools that I just can't leave alone!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is much like Facebook's "Friend's in Common" feature but there seems to be no end in sight!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paulfabretti</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 05:29:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Friendfeed bringing us more up to date yet further apart?</title><link>http://blendingthemix.com/2008/03/27/is-friendfeed-bringing-us-more-up-to-date-yet-further-apart/#comment-6090194</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It can get a bit much yes, but as Corvida says, you don't need to track everything. I would like for Friendfeed to become a bit more granular. For now, I have it open quite a lot and I check in now and again to see what's happening "above the fold", so to speak. But I'm not yet actively using it though, as I do Twitter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nap Fisker</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:40:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Friendfeed bringing us more up to date yet further apart?</title><link>http://blendingthemix.com/2008/03/27/is-friendfeed-bringing-us-more-up-to-date-yet-further-apart/#comment-6090193</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not necessarily. The option is there just incase you have the time and WANT to connect with other people sharing similar interests. You're not obligated to use it though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Corvida</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:00:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>